 |
POLLING
A collaborative survey & analysis with Nicole Kistler
In the two-year process of funding, planning and creating the
Living Barge Project,
Nicole and I learned a great deal about the business of public art. Grants
often asked us to measure our success, which struck us as particularly odd
- since art is such a subjective medium, how does one know when they have
been successful? It made us wonder how people value art and what factors
figure into that assessment. Fortunately, in our parallel (professional)
lives, we both have experience trying to assess subjective things using
scientific means, or assigning a value to things like a view of the mountains,
quality of life, or an ecosystem. It's absurd that we have to quantify these
things in order to protect them.
So we applied these same social science
methods to art. We conducted 2 surveys. The first survey was given to three
different groups - people at the Pioneer Square Art Walk (outside of SOIL),
riders on the Bremerton ferry which connects Seattle to the military town
of Bremerton, and students at Aviation High School where we had been teaching
a high school class. This survey, shown below, asked people what they
thought of art and where and how often they looked at it. For the second
survey we created two images - one of a painting in a museum, and a photoshopped
image of the same painting sitting in the art section of a thrift store (the
pictures in the installation view above). We showed people at the Fremont
Sunday Market one or another of the images and asked them to set a value
on the painting they saw.
By designing surveys about something
that is personal, subjective, and difficult to categorize, we were able to
expose some of the inherent difficulties in the survey process - the forced
choices, question wording, and categorizing that not only can signal poor
survey design, but outright manipulation. As our society has become more
and more obsessed with data collection, polling and surveying to make decisions,
it has become common practice to design a survey to get the answer you want
- leaving us all data rich and information poor. This was reflected in the
chaotic 'punk rock science fair' presentation of the results of our analysis,
shown below as installed at Crawl Space Gallery in Seattle.
The act of giving and taking a survey
is a public act and a personal one. In answering survey questions, the respondent
must make a number of decisions - whether to be straightforward and cooperative
no matter how unsatisfactory the choices are, or to be noncooperative or
answer untruthfully. It's also an act of trust - that the information you
give is not going to be manipulated or tabluated in a way that you did not
intend.
The surveyor is in the uncomfortable situation of being the face that no
one wants to see coming their way, and having to establish a nearly instantaneous
trust or rapport with their potential respondents. For the surveyor, tabluating
and analyzing the data is the private act - one that is fraught with
unanticipated questions, judgement calls, and follow-up questions that you
can never ask.
[ back to installations
index ] |